Today, we will be discussing Taken on Bluray.
The Blu-ray in question offers both theatrical and unrated editions. Having seen the former in the theater, I chose the latter.
As per usual, this review will be spoiler free.
Taken is the story of a father who had been a spy. He quit his day job, as it were, to build a relationship with his daughter who is turning 17 as the film opens. She wants to go to Paris with her 19 year old friend, and he doesn't like it.
My little sister went to Europe when she was 16 with a church group and I remember my own father being reticent even about that - something I completely understand and agree with, as it happens.
Eventually, her father agrees after thinking about it, then gives her an international cellphone so he can keep track of her. No sooner than they exit the airport in Paris do they do something stupid: they share a cab with some random guy they just met, followed by telling him all about where they are staying and how they'll be all by themselves there.
When Kim (his daughter) finally calls home, the kidnappers burst in and take her friend; she describes it all to her father and he tells her what to do, and specifically, that she will in fact be Taken, which she is shortly thereafter.
Not to give anything away, the next hour or so involves some fast paced action, lots of violence, and a really nice body count. Basically, Liam Neeson is a bad ass.
Quick bit of info on the disc itself. Audio is 5.1, didnt find anything particularly exciting to report in the surround sound department on this flick. As is standard with blu-ray, the video is 1080p at ~24 fps (Blu-rayStats.com says it is 23.976 fps).
And I just noticed that there is a PiP/Bonus View special feature, "Black Ops Field Manual", that promises to provide up to date mission information in the form of anatomical and geographical info. So I'll have to check that out next time I watch the flick.
Lastly, it also comes with a Digital Copy, so you can watch it on your iPod should you so choose.
Verdict: If you enjoy movies with action and violence, buy it.
Wednesday, July 29. 2009
Disconnection
In this day in age, I find it fairly hard to disconnect for any length of time.
I'm talking about a true disconnect.
Dump the cell phone, turn off the computer, get off the internet, turn off the TV, and stay that way for a spell. I know for some people it really isn't all that hard, but when you're life revolves around technology and computers, it is a lot more difficult. Not only is it challenging just to execute in the first place, but at least for myself, I find it difficult to stay that way.
Continue reading "Disconnection" »
I'm talking about a true disconnect.
Dump the cell phone, turn off the computer, get off the internet, turn off the TV, and stay that way for a spell. I know for some people it really isn't all that hard, but when you're life revolves around technology and computers, it is a lot more difficult. Not only is it challenging just to execute in the first place, but at least for myself, I find it difficult to stay that way.
Continue reading "Disconnection" »
Monday, July 27. 2009
Review: Yes Man
Yes Man stars Jim Carrey and Zooey Deschanel. It is a great little comedy about a guy who is in a rut and has little to no motivation to escape it.
Enter the premise of the movie: he attends a seminar where he promises to start saying yes to everything, from there his adventure unfolds. First off, he gives a homeless man a ride to the middle of nowhere in conjunction with letting him use his cell phone (which he promptly kills the battery on) and then ends up giving him all his cash. As he starts to pull away after dropping the homeless guy off, the car dies, which means he now has to walk to the nearest gas station. As he is filling up his gas can Zooey shows up and life becomes so much more interesting.
Eventually, he learns that he can't just go around saying yes to everything, that like all things in life it requires moderation. Anyone who has seen Lost Horizons may recall this notion.
Something incredible I just noticed during my rewatch: Ana Ng by They Might Be Giants is playing when he is at his boss' Harry Potter Theme Party. I didn't notice it till right as the scene changed, and had to rewind it a bit to make sure I heard it right, but sure enough it was there.
One annoying thing about the disc, there is a promo for the awesomeness of blu-ray that you can't hit menu to escape... which as far as annoyances go is second only to previews you can't press menu to skip.
Lastly, there is a scene of the principals going rollerblading after the credits start rolling at the end of the movie.
Verdict: great comedy, if you enjoy either of the principals, I'd say buy it.
Enter the premise of the movie: he attends a seminar where he promises to start saying yes to everything, from there his adventure unfolds. First off, he gives a homeless man a ride to the middle of nowhere in conjunction with letting him use his cell phone (which he promptly kills the battery on) and then ends up giving him all his cash. As he starts to pull away after dropping the homeless guy off, the car dies, which means he now has to walk to the nearest gas station. As he is filling up his gas can Zooey shows up and life becomes so much more interesting.
Eventually, he learns that he can't just go around saying yes to everything, that like all things in life it requires moderation. Anyone who has seen Lost Horizons may recall this notion.
Something incredible I just noticed during my rewatch: Ana Ng by They Might Be Giants is playing when he is at his boss' Harry Potter Theme Party. I didn't notice it till right as the scene changed, and had to rewind it a bit to make sure I heard it right, but sure enough it was there.
One annoying thing about the disc, there is a promo for the awesomeness of blu-ray that you can't hit menu to escape... which as far as annoyances go is second only to previews you can't press menu to skip.
Lastly, there is a scene of the principals going rollerblading after the credits start rolling at the end of the movie.
Verdict: great comedy, if you enjoy either of the principals, I'd say buy it.
Friday, July 24. 2009
A+ Testing Experience
A little while back I, with the help of some friendly competition with Lauren, finally got my A+ certification. Well, more importantly I finally got off my rear to study for it and take the test. I thought I'd briefly share the material I used to study and what the test was like.
I read Mike Meyers' A+ Certification Passport. I've got to say this is not the world's most exciting book. The chapters get progressively longer (and seemingly more insurmountable) as the book goes on. It isn't as dry as some technical books I've read, but it will test your patience and sanity to read this book. Lauren had much the same experience and we both took much longer to get through it than we expected. Truth be told, this book covers a lot of stuff that is useful to know for a first time IT Technician, but most of it isn't on the A+ test. A lot of material on the test was never covered in this book at all. That realization (after the testing was over) displeased me greatly.
The second study aid was practice questions, which I initially got to supplement the book. I'll tell you this, these practice questions are great; they are damn close to what is actually on the test as compared to the ones in the book, which were no where close. I'd be willing to say that mastering these practice questions will do you better than the book. Granted, while it may let you pass the test, you won't be good for shit in the real world. Then again it is my belief that the A+ Certification is not a very good indicator of real world skill.
The test itself? Basically, you sign up to take the test at any authorized testing center by Pearson VUE or Thompson Prometric center and simply show up a little bit before your allotted time. Lauren and I were doing the testing together, so we decided to take a Friday and do both tests (You need 220-601 and one of 220-602/ 603/ 604). We scheduled one test (90 minutes long), time for lunch (another 90 minutes) and then the second test (a final 90 minutes). One thing I want to make clear: you're allotted 90 minutes for the test itself. You can use as little or as much of that 90 minutes as you need; there is about 15 minutes worth of "other stuff" before and after. Before is mostly laying down how things work, agreeing to their NDA, etc. After is a bunch of demographic questions (who are you, why did you take the test, who's paying for it, etc).
I took and completed the first test (220-601) in 22 minutes. I was free to leave at that point, or the proctor offered to let me take the next test right then and there. The location we went to was not busy, so this may not be the case for all locations or times. Obviously, since Lauren was still working, it wasn't worth it, so I played around outside a bit. When we left, the proctor informed Lauren that we could come back and do the next test at any time that day, so we took her up on it. We had a quick lunch and came right back, better to get it over with.
The second test (220-602) took me 28 minutes (An entire extra 6 minutes! I had to slow down!) and was MUCH harder than we expected. I don't remember much (if any) of it being covered in the A+ book. In addition, to screw with your confidence, they ask you questions that aren't scored. Basically, they are "trial" questions that they want to see how people do on, for possible inclusion in the next version. I remember they asked about a specification that hadn't even been created when this version of the test was released. Again, I finished in under half an hour (though not by much), which just goes to show how cautious I was being on the questions (Note: I've been doing IT stuff for 15+ years). While I passed, Lauren, unfortunately, didn't do nearly as well.
After taking a few days off, Lauren really went to work on the practice questions I had previously gotten. After a serious study of them, she retook and passed the second test (220-602) with flying colors. We both decided that the book was less than helpful and the practice questions were the way to go. Which is sad, of course, because simply memorizing questions/answers doesn't "teach" you anything.
Any other A+ test takers out there? How does this compare to your own testing experience?
I read Mike Meyers' A+ Certification Passport. I've got to say this is not the world's most exciting book. The chapters get progressively longer (and seemingly more insurmountable) as the book goes on. It isn't as dry as some technical books I've read, but it will test your patience and sanity to read this book. Lauren had much the same experience and we both took much longer to get through it than we expected. Truth be told, this book covers a lot of stuff that is useful to know for a first time IT Technician, but most of it isn't on the A+ test. A lot of material on the test was never covered in this book at all. That realization (after the testing was over) displeased me greatly.
The second study aid was practice questions, which I initially got to supplement the book. I'll tell you this, these practice questions are great; they are damn close to what is actually on the test as compared to the ones in the book, which were no where close. I'd be willing to say that mastering these practice questions will do you better than the book. Granted, while it may let you pass the test, you won't be good for shit in the real world. Then again it is my belief that the A+ Certification is not a very good indicator of real world skill.
The test itself? Basically, you sign up to take the test at any authorized testing center by Pearson VUE or Thompson Prometric center and simply show up a little bit before your allotted time. Lauren and I were doing the testing together, so we decided to take a Friday and do both tests (You need 220-601 and one of 220-602/ 603/ 604). We scheduled one test (90 minutes long), time for lunch (another 90 minutes) and then the second test (a final 90 minutes). One thing I want to make clear: you're allotted 90 minutes for the test itself. You can use as little or as much of that 90 minutes as you need; there is about 15 minutes worth of "other stuff" before and after. Before is mostly laying down how things work, agreeing to their NDA, etc. After is a bunch of demographic questions (who are you, why did you take the test, who's paying for it, etc).
I took and completed the first test (220-601) in 22 minutes. I was free to leave at that point, or the proctor offered to let me take the next test right then and there. The location we went to was not busy, so this may not be the case for all locations or times. Obviously, since Lauren was still working, it wasn't worth it, so I played around outside a bit. When we left, the proctor informed Lauren that we could come back and do the next test at any time that day, so we took her up on it. We had a quick lunch and came right back, better to get it over with.
The second test (220-602) took me 28 minutes (An entire extra 6 minutes! I had to slow down!) and was MUCH harder than we expected. I don't remember much (if any) of it being covered in the A+ book. In addition, to screw with your confidence, they ask you questions that aren't scored. Basically, they are "trial" questions that they want to see how people do on, for possible inclusion in the next version. I remember they asked about a specification that hadn't even been created when this version of the test was released. Again, I finished in under half an hour (though not by much), which just goes to show how cautious I was being on the questions (Note: I've been doing IT stuff for 15+ years). While I passed, Lauren, unfortunately, didn't do nearly as well.
After taking a few days off, Lauren really went to work on the practice questions I had previously gotten. After a serious study of them, she retook and passed the second test (220-602) with flying colors. We both decided that the book was less than helpful and the practice questions were the way to go. Which is sad, of course, because simply memorizing questions/answers doesn't "teach" you anything.
Any other A+ test takers out there? How does this compare to your own testing experience?
Wednesday, July 22. 2009
Review: The Incredible Hulk (Xbox 360)
I bought Incredible Hulk for the Xbox 360 at Best Buy a while back for $20. I wanted to get it because I knew it was an open environment similar to Spider-Man: Web of Shadows (which incidentally, was the first game I got all of the achievements for), and also because you could play in Hulk Buster armor if you had an Iron Man save (which I did).
In general, I have to say the game sucks. Maybe this is tainted by how much... just better Spider-Man was. Both games take place on the same island and you would think have the same sights to see, but for some reason Incredible Hulk just didn't quite measure up.
One of the problematic things would be the special powers that you get as you advance the story. They occasionally, fire off when you don't intend them too, although much more often is them not firing when you want them, particularly important when you are trying to heal yourself.
In a concept that I'm sure came from the GTA series, as you destroy things, your threat meter goes up and "strike teams" start to appear based on whatever your current level is, the quickest easiest way to drop your threat meter is to take the subway, because apparently it is impossible to chase a giant green biped through a crowded subway...
Yeah... but if you didn't have that option the game would get damned impossible, as the higher strike levels will just destroy you if you stand still.
In general, I found the game very frustrating and lacking in the fun factor. I recommend you pass on purchasing it, even if it is only $10.
In general, I have to say the game sucks. Maybe this is tainted by how much... just better Spider-Man was. Both games take place on the same island and you would think have the same sights to see, but for some reason Incredible Hulk just didn't quite measure up.
One of the problematic things would be the special powers that you get as you advance the story. They occasionally, fire off when you don't intend them too, although much more often is them not firing when you want them, particularly important when you are trying to heal yourself.
In a concept that I'm sure came from the GTA series, as you destroy things, your threat meter goes up and "strike teams" start to appear based on whatever your current level is, the quickest easiest way to drop your threat meter is to take the subway, because apparently it is impossible to chase a giant green biped through a crowded subway...
Yeah... but if you didn't have that option the game would get damned impossible, as the higher strike levels will just destroy you if you stand still.
In general, I found the game very frustrating and lacking in the fun factor. I recommend you pass on purchasing it, even if it is only $10.
Monday, July 20. 2009
Eee: Game On
Everyone knows the real reason anyone uses a computer is to play games (or at least a close second... but not everyone watches porn). With that in mind, here's a few games that I have enjoyed investigating.
Still haven't got StarCraft to connect to Battle.net, so no fix to pass on there.
PlanetSide - I right-clicked the link on my desktop and then used the "Troubleshoot Compatibility" option and it chose XP SP 2 and then launched up something I hadn't seen before that I couldn't actually use to get into the game. Then Jon reminded me of the incompatibility on Vista, and the fix. I navigated over to planetside.exe and followed the instructions on the aforementioned link and it got up and running all pretty like. Well... at least it got to the login page popup that then scans your computer.
Then it errored out saying "Please start PlanetSide using the LaunchPad"
So then I went and set LaunchPad.exe to run as Win95 (like the link told me too and I ignored thinking Windows 7 knew better...) and the launcher and login page came up, and then I hit play and... I hear sound... and start to see some of the initial screens, but when I go to use Fn F7 to mute it, it goes back to the desktop and shows a black screen, so uh... don't do that. Task Manager, End Process Tree again, and try to start it again (this time with headphones plugged in, so it doesn't serenade everyone).
And again with the back to desktop with the black screen. Music still playing though, until it wasn't.
I'm going to rule this one a no-go on Win7
Guild Wars -for a quick and easy install, here's a tip: if you already have GW installed somewhere else, you can speed up the install by downloading the tiny client install, run it and it will start to download, feel free to kill it as soon as it shows up on your Start Menu. Then grab Gw.dat from another machine and copy it over, then no more download necessary (presuming it was already up to date). Also, if you want to skip ever having to download in the middle of a mission/party, you can run this before you start playing:
and it will download EVERYTHING, including those expansions you have not yet purchased.
I played Guild Wars for a bit and have to say it runs pretty darn smoothly. Loading the non-instanced areas take a little bit of time, but I generally don't need to find anyone who isn't an NPC, so this isn't a problem (as they load first).
Recently, DDO announced it was going free to play, so I might have to give that a shot once more. Jon and I played it a while back; he as a Cleric and I as a Rogue (a class that apparently does it from behind). When it comes available August 6, Jon and I will have to try it out.
Win7 comes with a number of games, more than just Spider, Solitaire, and Minesweeper of old. Mahjong, Spades, Hearts, Backgammon, Checkers, Freecell, Chess, and Purble Place. The last one is the only one I had no clue about. Seems to be a kids game.
Jon had a good suggestion, which is to explore Portable Games as a source of other games. The premise here being that if it works on a thumbstick it will work on an Eee.
One last place of note, Kongregate. This is a nice flash site and one of my favorite online game sites. With the smaller screen factor, you will need to utilize F11 (aka the full screen key) to be able to get the most out of your gaming experience.
Still haven't got StarCraft to connect to Battle.net, so no fix to pass on there.
PlanetSide - I right-clicked the link on my desktop and then used the "Troubleshoot Compatibility" option and it chose XP SP 2 and then launched up something I hadn't seen before that I couldn't actually use to get into the game. Then Jon reminded me of the incompatibility on Vista, and the fix. I navigated over to planetside.exe and followed the instructions on the aforementioned link and it got up and running all pretty like. Well... at least it got to the login page popup that then scans your computer.
Then it errored out saying "Please start PlanetSide using the LaunchPad"
So then I went and set LaunchPad.exe to run as Win95 (like the link told me too and I ignored thinking Windows 7 knew better...) and the launcher and login page came up, and then I hit play and... I hear sound... and start to see some of the initial screens, but when I go to use Fn F7 to mute it, it goes back to the desktop and shows a black screen, so uh... don't do that. Task Manager, End Process Tree again, and try to start it again (this time with headphones plugged in, so it doesn't serenade everyone).
And again with the back to desktop with the black screen. Music still playing though, until it wasn't.
I'm going to rule this one a no-go on Win7
Guild Wars -for a quick and easy install, here's a tip: if you already have GW installed somewhere else, you can speed up the install by downloading the tiny client install, run it and it will start to download, feel free to kill it as soon as it shows up on your Start Menu. Then grab Gw.dat from another machine and copy it over, then no more download necessary (presuming it was already up to date). Also, if you want to skip ever having to download in the middle of a mission/party, you can run this before you start playing:
"C:\Program Files\Guild Wars\gw.exe" -imageand it will download EVERYTHING, including those expansions you have not yet purchased.
I played Guild Wars for a bit and have to say it runs pretty darn smoothly. Loading the non-instanced areas take a little bit of time, but I generally don't need to find anyone who isn't an NPC, so this isn't a problem (as they load first).
Recently, DDO announced it was going free to play, so I might have to give that a shot once more. Jon and I played it a while back; he as a Cleric and I as a Rogue (a class that apparently does it from behind). When it comes available August 6, Jon and I will have to try it out.
Win7 comes with a number of games, more than just Spider, Solitaire, and Minesweeper of old. Mahjong, Spades, Hearts, Backgammon, Checkers, Freecell, Chess, and Purble Place. The last one is the only one I had no clue about. Seems to be a kids game.
Jon had a good suggestion, which is to explore Portable Games as a source of other games. The premise here being that if it works on a thumbstick it will work on an Eee.
One last place of note, Kongregate. This is a nice flash site and one of my favorite online game sites. With the smaller screen factor, you will need to utilize F11 (aka the full screen key) to be able to get the most out of your gaming experience.
Friday, July 17. 2009
Ride Friday: Test ride BMW R1200RT
I've been researching and looking at touring bikes for a while now. Ever since I've had to return John's bike, I've been keeping my eye out for used bikes and doing more digging from time to time. After my first long ride, which I've talked about previously, I knew what I wanted from a touring bike. I wanted a touring bike that wasn't a luxury bike (like the Honda Gold Wing or the BMW K1200LT - even though its a nice bike), but at the same time, I wanted to avoid the sport touring bikes that were a bit heavy on the sport. Oh, and before you ask, no I didn't want a cruiser.
This is all just personal preference.
The main problem is that while I can spend weeks researching, it doesn't mean anything if the bike is too tall for me, or I don't find it comfortable. The topic of height is really what narrowed down my selections. The only motorcycles I had been on previously were cruisers (which are known for being low) and since I'm height impaired (translation: short) I wasn't sure I could even ride any of the touring bikes (all of which tend to be a bit on the higher side). So off I went.
Continue reading "Ride Friday: Test ride BMW R1200RT" »
This is all just personal preference.
The main problem is that while I can spend weeks researching, it doesn't mean anything if the bike is too tall for me, or I don't find it comfortable. The topic of height is really what narrowed down my selections. The only motorcycles I had been on previously were cruisers (which are known for being low) and since I'm height impaired (translation: short) I wasn't sure I could even ride any of the touring bikes (all of which tend to be a bit on the higher side). So off I went.
Continue reading "Ride Friday: Test ride BMW R1200RT" »
(Page 1 of 2, totaling 14 entries)
next page »



